I had my DNA analysed.
I am 2.8 % neanderthal and 4.2 % denisovan.
That may explain certain things about me.
I am 2.8 % neanderthal and 4.2 % denisovan.
That may explain certain things about me.
If Humans evolved from apes or whatever than why is there no fossil trail?? why isn't there half apes half whatever they came from? evolution is a terrible theory. but yet it's taught as fact.
crazy... Of course i believe Adaptation but that is completely different.
crazy... Of course i believe Adaptation but that is completely different.
@LeoHoward
Evolution theory does not deal exclusively with the topic of people evolving from apes you know. There are plenty of fossils of other animals, that evolution explains.
Lets say, for the sake of argument that, humans are a special case that did not come from evolution, will you at least accept as most likely theory that all (other) animals evolved from some common ancestor(s). Or you have a better theory? Maybe your theory is simpler than the currently accepted one and explains more observables? Again, no such things as facts when we talk about scientific theories - it is indeed just a theory! The question is what is the alternative explanation/model. Or you actually don't care about explaining stuff, you just care about defending some ideas and rituals that don't contradict at all with those theories
Evolution theory does not deal exclusively with the topic of people evolving from apes you know. There are plenty of fossils of other animals, that evolution explains.
Lets say, for the sake of argument that, humans are a special case that did not come from evolution, will you at least accept as most likely theory that all (other) animals evolved from some common ancestor(s). Or you have a better theory? Maybe your theory is simpler than the currently accepted one and explains more observables? Again, no such things as facts when we talk about scientific theories - it is indeed just a theory! The question is what is the alternative explanation/model. Or you actually don't care about explaining stuff, you just care about defending some ideas and rituals that don't contradict at all with those theories
As i said, I believe that animals adapted. I don't think 30,000 types of dogs were created... Well saying that we evolved from slime kinda contradicts with us being inteligently designed.
@LeoHoward
You should actually look into the origin of dogs. It is quite interesting theory - I think the new Cosmos series on Netflix has it in some of its episodes.
Adaptation is part of the whole evolution process as described in the evolution theory. How does your "adaptation theory" differs than the popular evolution theory?? According to you it is completely different
You should actually look into the origin of dogs. It is quite interesting theory - I think the new Cosmos series on Netflix has it in some of its episodes.
Adaptation is part of the whole evolution process as described in the evolution theory. How does your "adaptation theory" differs than the popular evolution theory?? According to you it is completely different
Why bother with an evolution debate when the earth is flat?
But how did evolution proceed on the other side of the flat earth?
@kifaru , simple, all species have developed wings.
To whom it concerns :-
Evolution is a hoax which cannot be substantiated by science.
Evolutionists use carbon dating to say an item is millions of years old. Of course they are presuming that carbon hasn't changed over millions of years which in itself is a contradiction to their beliefs.
Evolutionists have an a la carte approach to science....... Do you.
Read the arguments against evolution and then make up your mind.
Don't just blindly follow the liberalist agenda.
Evolution is a hoax which cannot be substantiated by science.
Evolutionists use carbon dating to say an item is millions of years old. Of course they are presuming that carbon hasn't changed over millions of years which in itself is a contradiction to their beliefs.
Evolutionists have an a la carte approach to science....... Do you.
Read the arguments against evolution and then make up your mind.
Don't just blindly follow the liberalist agenda.
Having blind faith to the bible is the EXACT same thing as having blind faith to a science book.
In this thread there are lots of members of the science religion preaching their gospel and quoting "hadiths" (ie. books and publishings). Maybe soon one of their "holy men" (ie. scientists) will join us and will tell us how he with his own eyes witnessed a scientific occurance just like Moses told that he with his own eyes winessed the burning bush and spoke to God.
Science is likely the most dangerous religion in the world, because it teaches that it is not a religion.
In this thread there are lots of members of the science religion preaching their gospel and quoting "hadiths" (ie. books and publishings). Maybe soon one of their "holy men" (ie. scientists) will join us and will tell us how he with his own eyes witnessed a scientific occurance just like Moses told that he with his own eyes winessed the burning bush and spoke to God.
Science is likely the most dangerous religion in the world, because it teaches that it is not a religion.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.