There are browser extension that show the information I gave. It seems to use the rapid time controls to display that info.
chromewebstore.google.com/detail/lichess-custom-stats/ppolcdjceepccgcemodacgafjcoaemlhAs for the time they used: Go to computer analysis and press the tab move time. See the graph for your self and hover the mouse over the line. It took seconds to race through the game. The game had 3 minutes each and they both only used not even a minute each. The time left on the clock was 2:06 and 2:12.
So the game was not a Rapid, nor a Blitz, but a bullet game, even if it should have been a Blitz game, it's not to me. The players treated the game like it was a bullet game. A bit faster it would have been treated like an ultrabullet game. If it was a clock race, than that's all it was and nothing more. White dominated the game. Analyse it using lucas chess gui to get a better picture of the elo graphs of each opponent and the values of each move.
[WhiteAccuracy "91.36"]
[BlackAccuracy "67.88"]
[TotalAccuracy "79.86"]
1.e4 b6 ? 2.d4 Bb7 3.Bd3 Nf6 4.Nd2 e6 5.Ne2 a6 ?! 6.O-O d5 ? 7.e5 Nfd7 8.Nf3 ?!
Be7 9.c3 O-O ? 10.Be3 c5 11.Rc1 c4 ?! 12.Bb1 Nc6 13.Qc2 g6 14.Bh6 Re8 15.Nf4 Bf8
16.Bxf8 Rxf8 ?! 17.h4 Kg7 18.h5 Ne7 ?! 19.hxg6 hxg6 20.Nh5+ Kh8 21.g4 Ng8 ?!
22.Kg2 f6 ? 23.Qxg6 Qe7 24.Rh1 Rf7 25.Ng7+ 1-0
Black was obviously not playing at the same performance level as white. This is why it's nothing special getting 98% on lichess. The less performing an opponent is, the more the other player shines.
98% is just one side of the coin. Black's first move was obviously done to face a challenge. That made it easy for white to gain the center.